<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YES! Now This is truly a happy story!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bofh.cx/index.php/2010/04/yes-now-this-is-truly-a-happy-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bofh.cx/index.php/2010/04/yes-now-this-is-truly-a-happy-story/</link>
	<description>Have you fed your little Bastard today?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:34:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention YES! Now This is truly a happy story! -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://bofh.cx/index.php/2010/04/yes-now-this-is-truly-a-happy-story/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention YES! Now This is truly a happy story! -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bofh.cx/index.php/2010/04/yes-now-this-is-truly-a-happy-story/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by bastardpost. bastardpost said: Bastard Post:: YES! Now This is truly a happy story! http://su.pr/2bS83f [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by bastardpost. bastardpost said: Bastard Post:: YES! Now This is truly a happy story! <a href="http://su.pr/2bS83f" rel="nofollow">http://su.pr/2bS83f</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azkar</title>
		<link>http://bofh.cx/index.php/2010/04/yes-now-this-is-truly-a-happy-story/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>azkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bofh.cx/index.php/2010/04/yes-now-this-is-truly-a-happy-story/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>It used to be that you could deposit a non-standard cheque, but would be hit with a fee for doing so ($5.00, I think?). When the Canadian Payments Association changed the standard cheque form a few years back, I think non-standard cheques became non-negotiable. (the point of the change was to allow cheques to be scanned and presented in electronic form .. though that project was eventually abandoned)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be that you could deposit a non-standard cheque, but would be hit with a fee for doing so ($5.00, I think?). When the Canadian Payments Association changed the standard cheque form a few years back, I think non-standard cheques became non-negotiable. (the point of the change was to allow cheques to be scanned and presented in electronic form .. though that project was eventually abandoned)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

